z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Implementing publisher policies that inform, support and encourage authors to share data: two case studies
Author(s) -
Leila Jones,
Rebecca Grant,
Iain Hrynaszkiewicz
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
insights the uksg journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.41
H-Index - 14
ISSN - 2048-7754
DOI - 10.1629/uksg.463
Subject(s) - openness to experience , transparency (behavior) , scholarship , open data , data sharing , open science , scholarly communication , key (lock) , public relations , political science , data science , sociology , publishing , computer science , psychology , law , medicine , social psychology , physics , alternative medicine , computer security , pathology , astronomy
Open research data is one of the key areas in the expanding open scholarship movement. Scholarly journals and publishers find themselves at the heart of the shift towards openness, with recent years seeing an increase in the number of scholarly journals with data-sharing policies aiming to increase transparency and reproducibility of research. In this article we present two case studies which examine the experiences that two leading academic publishers, Taylor & Francis and Springer Nature, have had in rolling out data-sharing policies. We illustrate some of the considerations involved in providing consistent policies across journals of many disciplines, reflecting on successes and challenges.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom