Post-publication peer review, in all its guises, is here to stay
Author(s) -
Michael Markie
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
insights the uksg journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.41
H-Index - 14
ISSN - 2048-7754
DOI - 10.1629/uksg.245
Subject(s) - cornerstone , the internet , peer review , public relations , internet privacy , data science , library science , world wide web , engineering ethics , computer science , political science , history , engineering , law , archaeology
Over the past few years there has been a rise in the use of post-publication peer review (PPPR) to complement pre-publication review and improve existing and future research published in the scientific literature. PPPR is not a new concept; post-publication evaluation and discussion of research has always happened organically through written or spoken dialogue. It is a cornerstone of the practice of science and it is how the extensive knowledge base we have today has been built up over time. However, with a greater volume of research now being undertaken and scientific dissemination becoming more digitised, the discussion and evaluation of science has started to migrate from private forums to the Internet, a universal platform where scientists can quickly make their thoughts on specific papers more widely available to a much broader audience
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom