z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Post-publication peer review, in all its guises, is here to stay
Author(s) -
Michael Markie
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
insights the uksg journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.41
H-Index - 14
ISSN - 2048-7754
DOI - 10.1629/uksg.245
Subject(s) - cornerstone , the internet , peer review , public relations , internet privacy , data science , library science , world wide web , engineering ethics , computer science , political science , history , engineering , law , archaeology
Over the past few years there has been a rise in the use of post-publication peer review (PPPR) to complement pre-publication review and improve existing and future research published in the scientific literature. PPPR is not a new concept; post-publication evaluation and discussion of research has always happened organically through written or spoken dialogue. It is a cornerstone of the practice of science and it is how the extensive knowledge base we have today has been built up over time. However, with a greater volume of research now being undertaken and scientific dissemination becoming more digitised, the discussion and evaluation of science has started to migrate from private forums to the Internet, a universal platform where scientists can quickly make their thoughts on specific papers more widely available to a much broader audience

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom