
Minimaxing Theory and Practice
Author(s) -
Kaindl Hermann
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
ai magazine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.597
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 2371-9621
pISSN - 0738-4602
DOI - 10.1609/aimag.v9i3.944
Subject(s) - minimax , meaning (existential) , phenomenon , computer science , management science , quality (philosophy) , game theory , mathematical economics , epistemology , data science , mathematics , economics , philosophy
Empirical evidence suggests that searching deeper in game trees using the minimax propagation rule usually improves the quality of decisions significantly. However, despite many recent theoretical analyses of the effects of minimax look‐ahead, however, this phenomenon has still not been convincingly explained. Instead, much attention has been given to so‐called pathological behavior, which occurs under certain assumptions. This article supports the view that pathology is a direct result of these underlying theoretical assumptions. Pathology does not occur in practice, because these assumptions do not apply in realistic domains. The article presents several arguments in favor of minimaxing and focuses attention on the gap between their analytical formulation and their practical meaning. A new model is presented based on the strict separation of static and dynamic aspects in practical programs. finally, certain methods of improving minimax look‐ahead are discussed, drawing on insights gained from this research.