Grapevine Genotype Susceptibility toXylella fastidiosadoes not Predict Vector Transmission Success
Author(s) -
Arash Rashed,
Matthew P. Daugherty,
Rodrigo P. P. Almeida
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
environmental entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.749
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1938-2936
pISSN - 0046-225X
DOI - 10.1603/en11108
Subject(s) - xylella fastidiosa , biology , vector (molecular biology) , cultivar , pathogen , transmission (telecommunications) , host (biology) , genotype , leafhopper , horticulture , botany , bacteria , microbiology and biotechnology , hemiptera , ecology , genetics , gene , recombinant dna , electrical engineering , engineering
For vector-borne diseases, interactions between vector, host, and pathogen can influence patterns of disease spread. In particular, previous studies suggest that host genotype may influence disease dynamics because of differences in susceptibility to the pathogen and, therefore, subsequent vector transmission efficiency from these plants. We tested this hypothesis by using the pathogenic bacterium Xylella fastidiosa, the etiological agent of Pierce's disease in grapevines, and its leafhopper vector Homalodisca vitripennis (Germar). Pathogen infection level and transmission efficiency among several widely cultivated red and white wine, table, and raisin grape cultivars, were compared with the expectation that vector transmission rate would differ among cultivars, because of underlying differences in susceptibility to infection. The 14 grapevine genotypes evaluated showed significant differences among cultivars in the populations of X. fastidiosa that developed in petioles. 'Flame seedless' hosted the highest bacterial populations, between 1.81 and 2.05 times higher than the least susceptible 'Merlot', 'Crimson seedless', 'Grenache Noir', and 'Rubired'. Although the transmission rate of X. fastidiosa by H. vitripennis varied substantially (zero to 33%), it was not significantly different among cultivars. These results suggest that either the relationship between vine infection level and transmission is weaker than previously reported, or innate differences in vector preference among cultivars confounded any effects of vine susceptibility to infection.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom