Strategy or Legitimacy? Analysis of the Role of Institutional Development Plans in Brazilian Universities
Author(s) -
Maurício Andrade de Lima,
Fernando Antônio Ribeiro Serra,
Thiago Coelho Soares,
Carlos Rogério Montenegro de Lima
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
brazilian business review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.176
H-Index - 4
ISSN - 1808-2386
DOI - 10.15728/bbr.2020.17.1.4
Subject(s) - legitimacy , isomorphism (crystallography) , content analysis , relevance (law) , business , face (sociological concept) , public relations , confessional , institutional theory , political science , sociology , politics , law , social science , chemistry , crystal structure , crystallography
The aim of this study is to analyze whether Institutional Development Plans (IDP) are strategic documents or simply a response to seeking legitimacy in the face of regulatory pressures. This is a qualitative study based on information from 20 IDPs of Brazilian universities, categorized as private, public, community, or confessional. To analyze the IDPs, the content analysis methodology was used. As a result, it was found that most IDPs are much more descriptive documents, with operational goals and plans, than documents with strategic characteristics. On the other hand, in most of the documents analyzed, there was evidence of the importance and relevance of constructing an IDP as a benefit for the management and the university organization as a whole. It was concluded that IDPs tend to be documents that seek to provide universities with legitimacy in relation to the actors involved. In other words, they converge towards institutional isomorphism. Thus, they are not prepared, and used only due to institutional demands, but mainly due to legal impositions.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom