Making progression and award decisions
Author(s) -
S Burr,
Vehid Salih,
Thomas Gale,
David R. Moles,
Terry Vallance,
David R. Bristow
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
mededpublish
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2312-7996
DOI - 10.15694/mep.2017.000200
Subject(s) - process (computing) , quality (philosophy) , quality assurance , psychology , medical education , process management , public relations , engineering ethics , management science , computer science , political science , business , medicine , engineering , marketing , philosophy , epistemology , service (business) , operating system
It is incumbent on medical schools to show, both to regulatory bodies and to the public at large, that their graduating students are "fit for purpose" as doctors. Since students graduate by virtue of passing assessments, it is vital that schools quality assure their assessment procedures, standards and outcomes. An important part of this quality assurance process is how progression and award decisions are made. This begins with developing clear evidencebased policies and processes that ensure assessments are effective, relevant, fair, robust and secure. Assessment is a series of processes primarily designed to enable judgements to be made as to whether a student has, or has not, met the standard required for the outcomes at that stage. This article will provide a clear rationale and guidance for establishing robust processes for making progression and award decisions.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom