z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Tao Xingzhi’s Non-Communist Mass Education Movements in 1930s China
Author(s) -
Qian Zhu
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
review of history and political science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2333-5726
pISSN - 2333-5718
DOI - 10.15640/rhps.v3n1a3
Subject(s) - emancipation , communism , china , politics , modernization theory , capitalism , mass education , interwar period , sociology , state (computer science) , historiography , political science , political economy , social science , world war ii , higher education , law , algorithm , computer science
This paper attempts to reveal both the historical and the historiographical significances of a non-Communist mass education movement by challenging the existent scholarships in studying Tao Xingzhi’s educational theory and practices in 1930s China. My research indicates that the emergence and the development of Tao’s “Life Education” theory was the immediate response to the interwar history as it was shown in everyday life that had been changed under global capitalism, imperialism, and war. As it was closely engaged with the issues of inequality, exploitation, and human emancipation, Tao’s theory founded upon searching for solutions to the current structural crises in Chinese society and the world. Specifically, it dealt with how to transform the social hierarchy that had been reflected in the existent educational system. Therefore, Tao’s educational theory should be seen as one of the various political efforts during the interwar period that simultaneously perceived education as the effective means to transform society anew, which corresponded to the ongoing socio-political changes in the interwar period. To synchronize Tao’s educational theory with other educational ideas, I aim to challenge the arbitrary relationship between the West teaching and the East learning and the state/the powerful vs. the society/the powerless relationship that was presumed by the aforementioned approach. Indeed, Tao’s contribution to China’s educational modernization could not be seen as a failed resistance to state-institutional politics, rather it must be examined historically as a leftwing intellectual consideration of the present and longing for a future of social equality, which contrasts with the Chinese Communist Party’s mass education movement oriented by the Marxist class categories and class struggle.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom