The “Big Four” and “Sai”– A Case Study on the Management of Financial Audit Independence
Author(s) -
Ioan Gheorghe Țara
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
international journal of accounting and taxation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2372-4978
pISSN - 2372-4986
DOI - 10.15640/ijat.v2n3a5
Subject(s) - audit , accounting , independence (probability theory) , romanian , business , auditor independence , sample (material) , auditor's report , financial audit , financial independence , joint audit , audit evidence , payment , internal audit , finance , linguistics , statistics , philosophy , chemistry , mathematics , chromatography
The process of financial auditing and the auditors themselves must be independent and perceived as such. We analysed a sample of the companies that received financial auditing by the Big Four auditing firms in Romania and that parallel a sample of Romanian Court of Accounts audited companies. The conclusion suggests a difference in the audit opinion of these two groups, which might be the result of direct payment for contracted services or of the lack of such a connection. The lack of any moneyed connection between the auditor and the audited would improve financial audit independence.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom