z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Negotiating behavioural change: Therapists’ proposal turns in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
Author(s) -
Katie Ekberg,
Amanda LeCouteur
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
communication and medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.122
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1613-3625
pISSN - 1612-1783
DOI - 10.1558/cam.v9i3.229
Subject(s) - negotiation , psychology , conversation , session (web analytics) , psychotherapist , cognition , interrogative word , depression (economics) , applied psychology , psychiatry , computer science , communication , artificial intelligence , world wide web , political science , law , economics , macroeconomics
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an internationally recognised method for treating depression. However, many of the techniques involved in CBT are accomplished within the therapy interaction in diverse ways, and with varying consequences for the trajectory of therapy session. This paper uses conversation analysis to examine some standard ways in which therapists propose suggestions for behavioural change to clients attending CBT sessions for depression in Australia. Therapists' proposal turns displayed their subordinate epistemic authority over the matter at hand, and emphasised a high degree of optionality on behalf of the client in accepting their suggestions. This practice was routinely accomplished via three standard proposal turns: (1) hedged recommendations; (2) interrogatives; and (3) information-giving. These proposal turns will be examined in relation to the negotiation of behavioural change, and the implications for CBT interactions between therapist and client will be discussed.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom