z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Upper bounded and un-bounded ‘no more’
Author(s) -
Mojmír Dočekal
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
acta linguistica academica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.295
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 2560-1016
pISSN - 2559-8201
DOI - 10.1556/2062.2017.64.2.3
Subject(s) - negation , czech , linguistics , focus (optics) , bounded function , meaning (existential) , semantics (computer science) , slavic languages , natural (archaeology) , mathematics , psychology , computer science , philosophy , epistemology , history , physics , mathematical analysis , archaeology , optics , programming language
Constituent negation (CN) is commonly thought to be a subtype of natural language negation which does not exhibit substantial differences from the more frequent verbal negation. In this paper, I argue that at least Czech CN is different. I argue that its semantics targets both at-issue meaning and focus alternatives. The evidence will come from differences in interpretations between English and Czech with respect to negated comparatives adjoined to NPs (like no more than two people) and from many other types of negated constituents. I argue that the cross-linguistic variation can be explained if Slavic CN is treated as a focus-oriented particle, unlike English no which targets scalar alternatives

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom