z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Porównanie cystouretrografii mikcyjnej i sonocystografii mikcyjnej z użyciem ultrasonograficznego środka kontrastującego drugiej generacji w badaniu prospektywnym
Author(s) -
Maciej Piskunowicz,
Dominik Świętoń,
Dorota Rybczyńska,
Piotr Czarniak,
Arkadiusz Szarmach,
Mariusz Kaszubowski,
Edyta Szurowska
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of ultrasonography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.146
H-Index - 3
eISSN - 2451-070X
pISSN - 2084-8404
DOI - 10.15557/jou.2016.0034
Subject(s) - cystourethrography , medicine , vesicoureteral reflux , contrast (vision) , nuclear medicine , ultrasound , urology , reflux , radiology , artificial intelligence , computer science , disease
The invasiveness and exposure to radiation in voiding cystourethrography led to the introduction of alternative methods of diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux, including contrast enhanced voiding urosonography. While there is a limited number of studies comparing these methods using new generation ultrasound contrast agents, none of them compared both methods simultaneously. This study is aimed at assessing agreement between contrast enhanced voiding urosonography with second-generation ultrasound contrast agents and voiding cystourethrography.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom