English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Beekeeping delivers the rural people with sources of income, dietary use, pollination service and social benefit. In spite of the benefits obtained from beekeeping, farmer’s resistivity to adopt the recommended modern beekeeping technological components (packages) is among the major problem. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to examine the intensity of adoption of beekeeping technology package, and identify factors influencing adoption and intensity of adoption of beekeeping technology package in Sheko district. Stratified sampling procedure was used to select sample households. A total of 200 household heads were selected randomly from adopters and non-adopters categories of four potential beekeeping localities. Date was collected by using household survey and key informant interview and analyzed by using censured Tobit model. From sampled households 68% of respondents who have bee hive; the majority of them fall under medium adopters’ category. Variations in intensity of adoption of bee hive components were observed among adopter category. The output of censured Tobit model was indicate that six variables such as total livestock unit, apiary site visit by farmer, perceived cost of technology by farmer, distance of market center from home, knowledge of farmers for bee management and availability of bee hive technology were found to have significant influence on adoption and intensity of adoption of bee hive technological package. Therefore, agricultural policy and development interventions should give emphasis to the improvement of institutional support system so as to achieve wider adoption and intensity of adoption for small scale farmers. Keywords: Adopters; Livestock unit; Non-adopters; Tobit model References Adenisa, A. A., Zinnah, M. M., (1993). Technology characteristics, farmers' perceptions and adoption decision: A Tobit model application in Sierra Leone. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 9, 297-311. Akanbi, M. O. (1994). Non-wood Resources of Nigeria Rainforest. Honey Bee Management and Research. Amemiya, T. (1985). Advanced Econometrics. T.J press, Padstow Ltd. Great Britain. Asres, E. (2005). Access and Utilization of Development Communication by Rural Women in Dire Dawa Administrative Council, Eastern Ethiopia. An M.Sc Thesis Submitted to School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University. Belay, K., Degnet, A. (2004). Challenges facing Agricultural Extension agents: a case study from South-Western Ethiopia, African Development bank, published by Blackwell publishing Ltd, 139-168. Berhnu, B. (2002). Analysis of factors affecting the Adoption of crossbred Dairy cows in the central Highlands of Ethiopia An M.Sc Thesis Submitted to School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University. BoA (2013). Annual report on the general conditions of Shoko Woreda, Bench Maji Zone Zone, Mizan Teferi. Dinardo, J., Johnson, J. (1997). Econometric Methods. Fourth Edition. The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc, New York. Fichtl, R., Admasu, A. (1994): Honeybee Flora of Ethiopia. MargrafVerlag, Germany, 43-50. Geoffrey, N. (2004). Factors Affecting Smallholder Farmers' Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Practice in Zambia. M.Sc Thesis Presented to Michigan State University, 13-36. Green, H. W. (2000). Econometric Analysis. Fourth Edition. New York University Macmillan Publishing Campany, 857-871 Legesse, D., Mulugeta, E., Belay, K. (2001). Determinants of Adoption of Soil Conservation Measures in Central Highlands of Ethiopia. The Case of Three s of North Shoa. Agrekon, 40, 3. Maddala, G. S. (1997). Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press. MoARD (2007). Livestock Development Master Plan Study. Phase I Report - Data Collection and Analysis, Volume N-Apiculture. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ministry of Agriculture & Rural Development. Nicola, B. (2002). Taking the sting out of beekeeping. Arid Lands Information Network-East Africa (CD-Rom). Nairobi, Kenya. Nuru, A. (2002). Geographical races of the Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) of the Northern Regions of Ethiopia. PhD dissertation, Rhodes University, Department of Zoology and Entomology, South Africa, 265. Rahmeto N, (2007). Determinants of Adoption of Improved Haricot Bean Production Package In Alaba Special Woreda, Southern Ethiopia. An M.Sc Thesis Submitted to School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University.

Adoption and intensity of adoption of beekeeping technology by farmers: The case of Sheko Woreda of Bench-Maji Zone, South West Ethiopia