English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The author analyzes the selection of preventive measures in the form of house arrest in Russian criminal proceedings on the basis of universal and European standards of guaranteeing respect for individual rights. The article says that the application of preventive measures significantly restricts the right to protect the dignity of the individual, the right to freedom and personal inviolability, the right to move freely , choose the place of residence and residence. The author defends the alternative when applying preventive measures in the form of house arrest. This preventive measure, unlike detention, home arrest does not provide for the isolation of a person from the usual conditions of daily existence and to a greater extent guarantee the rights of citizens before the court decision.

Use of House Arrest In The Context of the Respecting the Constitutional Rights of an Individual in Russia