'His Heart Exposed to Prying Eyes, To Pity Has No Claim': Reflections on Hogarth and the Nature of Cruelty
Author(s) -
Lawrence Finsen
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
between the species an online journal for the study of philosophy and animals
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1945-8487
DOI - 10.15368/bts.1986v2n1.3
Subject(s) - pity , cruelty , philosophy , psychoanalysis , criminology , psychology , social psychology
In his famous discussion of the source of our duties concerning anirrals, the German philosopher Immanuel Kant approvingly mentions a series of engravings ( "The Four Stages of Cruelty") by the English artist William Hogarth as exemplifying one of his central contentions. [2] The approach to our duties regarding anirrals advocated by Kant holds that avoiding cruelty is the most fUndamental duty we can have to nonhuman animals. For convenience, I shall refer to this view as the "No-Cruelty" j:X)sition. It is not surprising that Kant cites Hogarth while explaining his own views; Hogarth's engravings provide a rich visual statement about the nature of cruelty and the moral status of its victims.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom