English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In 1990, Frank Wright introduced a method for measuring synonymous codon usage bias in a gene by estimation of the "effective number of codons," N(c). Several attempts have been made recently to improve Wright's estimate of N(c), but the methods that work in cases where a gene encodes a protein not containing all amino acids with degenerate codons have not been tested against each other. In this article I derive five new estimators of N(c) and test them together with the two published estimators, using resampling under rigorous testing conditions. Estimation of codon homozygosity, F, turns out to be a key to the estimation of N(c). F can be estimated in two closely related ways, corresponding to sampling with or without replacement, the latter being what Wright used. The N(c) methods that are based on sampling without replacement showed much better accuracy at short gene lengths than those based on sampling with replacement, indicating that Wright's homozygosity method is superior. Surprisingly, the methods based on sampling with replacement displayed a superior correlation with mRNA levels in Escherichia coli.

Estimating the “Effective Number of Codons”: The Wright Way of Determining Codon Homozygosity Leads to Superior Estimates