Competitive Economic Development of The Republic of Moldova
Author(s) -
Perchinschi Natalia,
Alexandr Gribincea
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
international business and accounting research journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2550-0368
pISSN - 2549-0303
DOI - 10.15294/ibarj.v2i1.38
Subject(s) - argument (complex analysis) , externality , economics , competition (biology) , intervention (counseling) , balance of payments , predatory pricing , dumping , commercial policy , product (mathematics) , international economics , trade barrier , action (physics) , international trade , market economy , microeconomics , monopoly , psychology , ecology , biochemistry , chemistry , geometry , mathematics , physics , quantum mechanics , psychiatry , biology
With this general framework in mind, this section has explained through various examples the circumstances in which economic theory would justify a temporary increase in trade barriers – even above the level of commitments in a trade agreement. These circumstances include when an import surge provides an argument for an increase in trade barriers as well as when a change in demand or supply or in policy leads to a sharp contraction for a particular sector and this, in turn, has a negative externality (like in the case of the one-company town). Another argument for trade policy intervention is when something alters the degree of competition in the market – for example, if a company indulges in predatory dumping. Other circumstances include developing countries providing support to infant industry, action to address balance of payment crises, and responding to a sharp increase in the world price of a product. In all these cases, the adoption of restrictive trade policy can be justified as a second-best option.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom