Sephora’s Starter Witch Kit
Author(s) -
Chris Miller
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
nova religio the journal of alternative and emergent religions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.16
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 1541-8480
pISSN - 1092-6690
DOI - 10.1525/nr.2022.25.3.87
Subject(s) - witch , appropriation , commodification , criticism , sociology , media studies , aesthetics , literature , art , philosophy , economy , ecology , linguistics , economics , biology
In late summer 2018, beauty chain Sephora announced the release of a “Starter Witch Kit” in collaboration with fragrance company Pinrose. By September, Sephora announced it was cancelling the product after receiving extensive criticism on social media, particularly from Modern Witches. This article examines the uproar surrounding Sephora’s Starter Witch Kit as it played out on Twitter. The debate on Twitter included Witches protesting the appropriation and commodification of their sacred traditions, as well as outsiders who questioned the right of Witches to complain about spiritual theft. This Twitter debate was an opportunity for Modern Witches to substantiate and legitimize their identities as Witches. Witches distinguished their identities as “authentic” by mocking certain products and consumers, and demarcated practices/traditions as distinctive of Witchcraft by calling them sacred. By accusing Sephora of spiritual theft, Witches also largely elided their own engagement with appropriation from religious traditions.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom