z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Cognitive Control and the Implicit Association Test: A Replication of Siegel, Dougherty, and Huber (2012)
Author(s) -
David J. Johnson,
David Ampofo,
Serra A Erbas,
Alison Robey,
Harry E. Calvert,
Victoria Garriques,
Julia Hatch,
Leigh Gulbransen,
Rabbiya Iqbal,
Maya Lewis,
Elinor Stern,
Michael R. Dougherty
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
collabra psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.444
H-Index - 10
ISSN - 2474-7394
DOI - 10.1525/collabra.27356
Subject(s) - implicit association test , association (psychology) , psychology , replication (statistics) , cognition , test (biology) , meta analysis , null hypothesis , control (management) , cognitive psychology , implicit attitude
The implicit association test (IAT) is widely used to measure evaluative associations towards groups or the self but is influenced by other traits. Siegel, Dougherty, and Huber (2012, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology) found that manipulating cognitive control via false feedback (Study 3) changed the degree to which the IAT was related to cognitive control versus evaluative associations. We conducted two replications of this study and a mini meta-analysis. Null-hypothesis tests, meta-analysis, and a small telescope approach demonstrated weak to no support for the original hypotheses. We conclude that the original findings are unreliable and that both the original study and our replications do not provide evidence that manipulating cognitive control affects IAT scores.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom