z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Biology Needs a Modern Assessment System for Professional Productivity
Author(s) -
Lucinda A. McDade,
David R. Maddison,
Robert Guralnick,
Heather Piwowar,
Mary Liz Jameson,
Kristofer M. Helgen,
Patrick S. Herendeen,
Andrew Hill,
Morgan L. Vis
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
bioscience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.761
H-Index - 209
eISSN - 1525-3244
pISSN - 0006-3568
DOI - 10.1525/bio.2011.61.8.8
Subject(s) - productivity , pace , conversation , commit , engineering ethics , the internet , computer science , sociology , economics , engineering , economic growth , geodesy , communication , database , geography , world wide web
Stimulated in large part by the advent of the Internet, research productivity in many academic disciplines has changed dramatically over the last two decades. However, the assessment system that governs professional success has not kept pace, creating a mismatch between modes of scholarly productivity and academic assessment criteria. In this article, we describe the problem and present ideas for solutions. We argue that adjusting assessment criteria to correspond to modern scholarly productivity is essential for the success of individual scientists and of our discipline as a whole. The authors and endorsers of this article commit to a number of actions that constitute steps toward ensuring that all forms of scholarly productivity are credited. The emphasis here is on systematic biology, but we are not alone in experiencing this mismatch between productivity and assessment. An additional goal in this article is to begin a conversation about the problem with colleagues in other subdisciplines of biology.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom