The Spatial Distribution of Threats to Species in Australia
Author(s) -
Megan C. Evans,
James E. M. Watson,
Richard A. Fuller,
Oscar Venter,
Simon Bennett,
Peter Marsack,
Hugh P. Possingham
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
bioscience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.761
H-Index - 209
eISSN - 1525-3244
pISSN - 0006-3568
DOI - 10.1525/bio.2011.61.4.8
Subject(s) - threatened species , biodiversity , geography , safeguarding , spatial distribution , ecology , spatial ecology , species distribution , distribution (mathematics) , environmental resource management , biology , habitat , environmental science , remote sensing , medicine , mathematical analysis , nursing , mathematics
Conservation is ultimately about safeguarding biodiversity by arresting and reversing the impacts of threatening processes. Although data on the distributions of species are increasingly well resolved, the spatial distributions of threats to species are poorly understood. We mapped the distributions of eight major threats to Australia's threatened plants, vertebrates, and invertebrates using the geographic ranges of species affected by particular threats as surrogates for their spatial occurrence. Our results indicate that simply quantifying the proportion of species affected by particular threatening processes does not adequately capture the variation in the spatial extent, prevalence, or predominance of threats to species. Conservation planning is an inherently spatial process; therefore, explicitly considering the spatial dimension of threats could significantly enhance our ability to direct efforts to areas where the greatest conservation outcomes can be delivered.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom