z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Microanalysis of Positive and Negative Content in Solution-Focused Brief Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Expert Sessions
Author(s) -
Sara Smock Jordan,
Adam S. Froerer,
Janet Beavin Bavelas
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of systemic therapies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1930-6318
pISSN - 1195-4396
DOI - 10.1521/jsyt.2013.32.3.46
Subject(s) - content (measure theory) , situational ethics , psychology , solution focused brief therapy , psychotherapist , cognition , clinical psychology , social psychology , psychiatry , mathematical analysis , mathematics
The models of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and solution-focused brief therapy (sFBT) differ in their primary focus: problem solving versus solution building. These theoretical differences imply dissimilar practices, including the content of the therapeutic dialogue. specifically, CBT sessions should include more talk about negative topics in clients’ lives such as problems and situational difficulties, whereas sFBT sessions should focus on positive topics in clients’ lives such as strengths and resources. We tested whether expert practice reflects these differences in the models. A reliable microanalysis revealed that demonstration sessions by three experts in each model differed significantly in the expected directions: negative content was significantly higher in CBT than sFBT sessions, and positive content was significantly higher in s than CBT sessions. There was also a significant tendency for clients to respond in kind (i.e., negative therapist content was followed by negative client content, and positive therapist content by positive client content).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom