z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Review of the Proposed K Isi Offset-Secant Method for Size-Insensitive Linear-Elastic Fracture Toughness Evaluation
Author(s) -
Douglas N. Wells,
Mark A. James,
Phillip A. Allen,
Kim Wallin
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
materials performance and characterization
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.224
H-Index - 12
eISSN - 2379-1365
pISSN - 2165-3992
DOI - 10.1520/mpc20170151
Subject(s) - materials science , fracture toughness , plasticity , crack growth resistance curve , crack tip opening displacement , fracture mechanics , compact tension specimen , limit load , tearing , linear elasticity , structural engineering , test method , toughness , displacement (psychology) , deformation (meteorology) , composite material , mechanics , stress intensity factor , crack closure , finite element method , mathematics , statistics , psychology , psychotherapist , physics , engineering
Recently proposed modifications to ASTM E399, Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness KIc of Metallic Materials, would provide a new size-insensitive approach to analyzing the force-displacement test record. The proposed size-insensitive linear-elastic fracture toughness, KIsi, targets a consistent 0.5-mm crack extension for all specimen sizes by using an offset secant that is a function of the specimen ligament length. With intent to increase flexibility in the test method, the KIsi evaluation method removes the Pmax/PQ criterion, which can penalize materials with rising tearing resistance curves, and increases the limits on specimen deformation, which allows more plasticity at the crack tip at the onset of crack extension. The primary motivation for this investigation is to confirm the validity of this new interpretation of the force-displacement test record in regard to the increase in acceptable specimen deformation. This article summarizes a finite element study of the effects of increased crack tip plasticity on the KIsi evaluation method, with two primary points of investigation: the continued validity of linear-elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) to describe the crack front conditions and the effect of crack tip plasticity on compliance change in the force-displacement record. The analytical study illustrates that LEFM assumptions remain valid at the increased deformation limit; however, the influence of plasticity on the compliance change in the test record is problematic. A proposed revision to the validity criteria for the KIsi test method is described.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom