English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The provincial governments of Newfoundland and Nova Scotia have each signed an accord with the Government of Canada to manage and share revenues from the development of their respective offhsore oil and gas fields. Negotiated provisions for offsetting equalization payments were an important component of each of these accords. This paper analyzes how effective these offset provisions might be in sheltering offshore oil revenue derived from the Hibernia project under various oil price scenarios. Both mathematical and simulation analyses demonstrate that the provisions negotiated by Nova Scotia shelter significantly more revenue than those of Newfoundland.

The Offshore Accords and Hibernia's Impact on the Newfoundland Treasury