z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Endovascular versus open surgical repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury
Author(s) -
James Barnard,
J. W. Humphreys,
Mohamad N Bittar
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.546
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1569-9293
pISSN - 1569-9285
DOI - 10.1510/icvts.2008.196873
Subject(s) - medicine , blunt , surgery , stent , cardiothoracic surgery , mortality rate , open surgery , complication , radiology
A best evidence topic in vascular surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether patients with acute traumatic thoracic aortic injury have a better outcome with endovascular or open surgical repair. Altogether, 283 papers were found using the reported search, of which five represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses of these papers are tabulated. We concluded that the peri-procedural mortality rate for patients with traumatic thoracic blunt aortic injury is lower for patients treated with an endovascular stent graft when compared to the open technique. This important benefit is at the cost of a high procedure complication rate, requirement for long-term surveillance of the stent and uncertain medium and longer-term outcome.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom