z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Is skeletonised internal mammary harvest better than pedicled internal mammary harvest for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
Author(s) -
Ali Asgar Behranwala
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1569-9293
pISSN - 1569-9285
DOI - 10.1510/icvts.2005.118935
Subject(s) - medicine , mammary artery , bypass grafting , artery , cardiology , grafting , surgery , bypass surgery , cardiac surgery , derivation , chemistry , organic chemistry , polymer
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether skeletonised internal mammary artery (IMA) is better than pedicle IMA in coronary artery bypass grafting? Altogether 106 papers were found using the reported search, of which 12 presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that skeletonisation increases the length of conduit by around 3 cm and may also increase flow and conduit diameter. Skeletonisation should be the technique of choice for diabetics in whom BIMA harvest is desired, but at the expense of an extra 15-20 min per operation, no convincing outcome benefits have been shown for single IMA harvest.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom