English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This non-randomized retrospective study included all patients operated on for CABG through median sternotomy between January 2000 and December 2002 by the same surgeon trained to both techniques. Using risk-adjusted comparison where expected mortality was given by the EuroSCORE value assessed pre-operatively, and studying mid-term survival and functional results we aimed to evaluate our indications for OPCAB versus conventional CABG through a consecutive series of 308 patients. Selected indications for OPCAB (n=154) were isolated LAD coronary system lesions and multivessel diseases with suitable anatomy in high surgical risk patients (EuroSCORE &gt; or = 5). The first 154 patients operated on conventionally during the time-study interval were included in the control group. Expected mortality was significantly higher in the OPCAB group: 4.29 [95% CI: 3.83-4.77] vs. 3.54 [95% CI: 3.17-3.91] (P=0.024). Observed mortality was 1.3% and 2.6% for patients treated OPCAB and with conventional technique, respectively. Survival at three years was 91.5 and 93.8% in the conventional and OPCAB groups, respectively. Angina-free survival at three years was 95.8% and 89.6% in the conventional and OPCAB groups, respectively (P=0.04). To promote OPCAB in selected patients results in decreasing operative risk to the price of worsening late functional results.

Off-pump coronary surgery in selected patients: better early outcome but more recurrence of angina?