More Evidence Challenging the Robustness and Usefulness of the Attraction Effect
Author(s) -
Sybil S. Yang,
Michael Lynn
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of marketing research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.321
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1547-7193
pISSN - 0022-2437
DOI - 10.1509/jmr.14.0020
Subject(s) - attraction , robustness (evolution) , econometrics , psychology , statistical power , statistical analysis , social psychology , cognitive psychology , statistics , economics , mathematics , biology , philosophy , biochemistry , linguistics , gene
Ninety-one attempts to produce an attraction effect (involving a total of 23 product classes and 73 different decoyed choice sets) produced only 11 reliable effects—significantly fewer than expected given the statistical power of the studies. Cross-scenario analyses indicated that the use of meaningful qualitative-verbal descriptions, as well as pictorial depictions, to differentiate choice options substantially reduced the size of those effects. Indeed, the authors found attraction effects at only chance levels using these types of stimuli. The article concludes with a brief discussion of the implications of these findings for both marketing practice and research.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom