How good are the investment options provided by defined contribution plan sponsors?
Author(s) -
Keith C. Brown,
W. V. Harlow
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
international journal of portfolio analysis and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2048-237X
pISSN - 2048-2361
DOI - 10.1504/ijpam.2012.046906
Subject(s) - plan (archaeology) , business , investment (military) , finance , political science , geography , archaeology , politics , law
We investigate the quality of the investment choices that sponsors of defined contribution plans offer to plan participants for their retirement portfolios. Using a unique database of over 30,000 plans, we calculate the performance of equity-oriented investment options that were included in plans compared to a sample of funds that were not. On average, plan options produce annualised risk-adjusted returns exceeding those of non-plan options by as much as 120 basis points, an outcome that is relatively insensitive to factor model specifications, time period, or investment style classification. This performance advantage is largely due to actively managed plan options; privately managed institutional funds do not appear to enjoy any incremental performance advantage relative to public mutual funds. We conclude that plan sponsors do appear to possess superior selection skills when designing the set of investment options offered to plan participants.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom