Quantifying recall bias in surgical safety: a need for a modern approach to morbidity and mortality reviews | Zendy

Hamad Abdulaziz AlSubaie | Zendy; Mitchell G. Goldenberg | Zendy; Teodor Grantcharov | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Quantifying recall bias in surgical safety: a need for a modern approach to morbidity and mortality reviews

Author(s) -

Hamad Abdulaziz AlSubaie,

Mitchell G. Goldenberg,

Teodor Grantcharov

Publication year - 2019

Publication title -

canadian journal of surgery

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.609

H-Index - 64

eISSN - 1488-2310

pISSN - 0008-428X

DOI - 10.1503/cjs.017317

Subject(s) - medicine , recall , preparedness , adverse effect , patient safety , health care , medline , debriefing , quality management , recall bias , emergency medicine , medical emergency , medical education , operations management , political science , law , economics , economic growth , philosophy , linguistics , management system , pathology

Despite recent investments into reducing errors and adverse events in health care, methods for quality improvement in surgery are outdated and ineffective. Most current efforts in this field are centred around morbidity and mortality conferences (MMCs), which have remained unchanged for over 100 years. The present study aimed to quantify the recall bias associated with details from surgical cases.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research