Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes | Zendy

Julian F. Daza | Zendy; Carolyn Michelle Tan | Zendy; Ryan J. Fielding | Zendy; Allison Brown | Zendy; Forough Farrokhyar | Zendy; Ilun Yang | Zendy

Open Access

Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes

Author(s) -

Julian F. Daza,

Carolyn Michelle Tan,

Ryan J. Fielding,

Allison Brown,

Forough Farrokhyar,

Ilun Yang

Publication year - 2018

Publication title -

canadian journal of surgery

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.609

H-Index - 64

eISSN - 1488-2310

pISSN - 0008-428X

DOI - 10.1503/cjs.008117

Subject(s) - medicine , propofol , sedation , confidence interval , endoscopy , esophagogastroduodenoscopy , odds ratio , anesthesia , therapeutic endoscopy , meta analysis , american society of anesthesiologists , surgery

Endoscopists may safely administer propofol without compromising procedural quality in patients classified as ASA I or II undergoing routine endoscopy. The results of this meta-analysis are limited by a lack of available high-quality studies. Further, large-scale studies are needed for definitive conclusions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research