z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Surgeon clinical practice variation and patient preferences during the informed consent discussion: a mixed-methods analysis in lumbar spine surgery
Author(s) -
Ali Zahrai,
Kunal Bhanot,
Xin Y. Mei,
Eric J. Crawford,
Zachary Tan,
Albert Yee,
Valerie A. Palda
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
canadian journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.609
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1488-2310
pISSN - 0008-428X
DOI - 10.1503/cjs.005619
Subject(s) - medicine , informed consent , lumbar spine , surgery , physical therapy , general surgery , alternative medicine , pathology
Patients with lumbar disc herniation may greatly benefit from microdiscectomy. Although spine surgeons performing microdiscectomy routinely obtain informed consent, the potential adverse events they disclose often vary. Moreover, little is known about what disclosures are deemed most valuable by patients. The aim of this mixed-methods study was to determine practice variations among spine surgeons in regard to the disclosure of potential adverse events during informed consent discussions for lumbar microdiscectomy and to determine which topics patients perceived to be valuable in the consent discussion.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom