English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Article History: Purpose: The present study aims to evaluate how the reliabilities computed using α, Stratified α, AngoffFeldt, and Feldt-Raju estimators may differ when sample size (500, 1000, and 2000) and item type ratio of dichotomous to polytomous items (2:1; 1:1, 1:2) included in the scale are varied. Research Methods: In this study, Cronbach’s α, Stratified α, Angoff-Feldt, and Feldt-Raju reliability coefficients were estimated on simulated datasets Received: 12 Mar. 2019 Received in revised form: 24 Feb. 2020 Accepted: 19 May. 2020 DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2020.87.5

Examining of Internal Consistency Coefficients in Mixed-Format Tests in Different Simulation Conditions