Guidance on determining indispensability and balancing potential benefits of animal experiments with costs to the animals with specific consideration of EU Directive 2010/63/EU
Author(s) -
Toni Lindl
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
altex
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.975
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1868-8551
pISSN - 1868-596X
DOI - 10.14573/altex.2012.2.219
Subject(s) - layperson , directive , context (archaeology) , risk analysis (engineering) , denial , european union , process (computing) , computer science , operations research , business , psychology , political science , law , engineering , paleontology , psychoanalysis , biology , programming language , economic policy , operating system
Within the context of a workshop, a concept and practical guidance were developed that seek to balance potential benefits of animal experiments to humans, other animals, and the environment against the pain, suffering, and distress caused to the experimental animals. The aim was to achieve transparent decisions that can be communicated in a concise manner that is accessible to a layperson and is in accordance with German national law and EU Directive 2010/63/EU. The steps of the resulting decision process deal with the classification of procedures into the four severity levels, the consideration of humane endpoints, determination of the indispensability of the procedure on the basis of sound scientific argument, classification into applied or basic research, determination of the probability of success in the case of applied research, and the cost-benefit analysis, culminating in a decision on the approval or denial of the procedure.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom