Quality Assurance by Extended Peer Review: Tools to Inform Debates, Dialogues & Deliberations | Zendy

Ângela Guimãraes Pereira | Zendy; Silvio Funtowicz | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Quality Assurance by Extended Peer Review: Tools to Inform Debates, Dialogues & Deliberations

Author(s) -

Ângela Guimãraes Pereira,

Silvio Funtowicz

Publication year - 2005

Publication title -

tatup zeitschrift für technikfolgenabschätzung in theorie und praxis

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

eISSN - 2199-9201

pISSN - 1619-7623

DOI - 10.14512/tatup.14.2.74

Subject(s) - quality assurance , peer review , quality (philosophy) , political science , engineering ethics , computer science , engineering , epistemology , law , operations management , philosophy , external quality assessment

In this paper the challenges of trans-disciplinary practice and quality assurance by extended peer review, in terms of knowl-edge co-production, mediation and repre-sentation, are addressed. Spaces for the articulation of plural narratives are ex-plored, including the opportunity to deploy new information technologies. The TIDDD (tools to inform debates, dialogues & delib-erations) is introduced in the context of the GOUVERNe project. 1 The Trans-disciplinary Challenge

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research