z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Anticipating and Incorporating Stakeholder Feedback when Developing Value-Added Models
Author(s) -
Ryan Balch,
Cory Koedel
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
education policy analysis archives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.727
H-Index - 46
ISSN - 1068-2341
DOI - 10.14507/epaa.v22.1701
Subject(s) - mandate , stakeholder , value (mathematics) , mathematics education , component (thermodynamics) , added value , test (biology) , state (computer science) , psychology , sociology , pedagogy , public relations , political science , business , computer science , mathematics , statistics , paleontology , physics , finance , algorithm , biology , law , thermodynamics
State and local education agencies across the United States are increasingly adopting rigorous teacher evaluation systems. Most systems formally incorporate teacher performance as measured by student test-score growth, sometimes by state mandate. An important consideration that will influence the long-term persistence and efficacy of these systems is stakeholder buy-in, including buy-in from teachers. In this study we document common questions from teachers about value-added measures and provide research-based responses to these questions. The questions come from teachers in Baltimore City Public Schools, who are evaluated using a combined measure of which value-added is one component. We focus on teacher questions about value-added because value-added generates the most concern from teachers. We also connect teacher concerns about value-added to other components of the evaluation system, such as classroom observations, although at present these other components epaa aape

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom