Interrelations between policymakers’ intentions and school agents’ interpretation of accountability policy in Israel
Author(s) -
Lisa Amdur,
Irit Mero-Jaffe
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
education policy analysis archives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.727
H-Index - 46
ISSN - 1068-2341
DOI - 10.14507/epaa.25.3016
Subject(s) - accountability , isomorphism (crystallography) , normative , interpretation (philosophy) , perception , metaphor , psychology , sociology , positive economics , social psychology , political science , public administration , economics , law , programming language , chemistry , linguistics , philosophy , neuroscience , computer science , crystal structure , crystallography
The study examined the interrelations between policymakers’ intentions for test-based accountability policy, and school agents’ perceptions and actions with regard to this policy. Mixed-methods were used and encompassed 24 policymakers, 80 school principals, 168 teachers and case studies of four schools. New institutional theory, including the concept of “environmental shift” (Powell & Di Maggio, 1991) and the metaphor of “coupling” (Weick, 1976), served as the conceptual framework. Findings indicate that the interrelations between intentions, perceptions and actions are mainly tightly coupled. These are discussed by invoking three types of institutional isomorphism (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983): coercive, mimetic and normative.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom