Effectiveness of Subliminal Stimuli in Lie Detection: Use of Physical Countermeasures | Zendy

Mandeep Sharma | Zendy; Amrita Yadava | Zendy; Nov Rattan Sharma | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Effectiveness of Subliminal Stimuli in Lie Detection: Use of Physical Countermeasures

Author(s) -

Mandeep Sharma,

Amrita Yadava,

Nov Rattan Sharma

Publication year - 2018

Publication title -

defence life science journal

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.135

H-Index - 3

eISSN - 2456-379X

pISSN - 2456-0537

DOI - 10.14429/dlsj.3.13415

Subject(s) - subliminal stimuli , polygraph , psychology , wilcoxon signed rank test , lie detection , audiology , cognitive psychology , social psychology , medicine , pedagogy , curriculum , deception

The objective of the present investigation was to study the effectiveness of subliminal stimuli in reducing the probability of use of countermeasures during polygraph was considered. Further, use of countermeasures (physical) would be more for supraliminal stimuli as compared to subliminal stimuli. Purposive total samples of 79 adults with (age range between 20-28 years) were selected for the present study. Windows Based Computerised Lie Detector (CLD-118) and Aversion Therapy Instrument (MBT-498) were used in present study. For analyses of the data, Friedman Test (non-parametric) followed by Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test (non-parametric), were applied. In the present investigation the effectiveness of subliminal stimuli in deterring the execution of countermeasures was studied, revealed that subliminal stimuli acted as a deterrent to physical countermeasures. The present findings indicate that subliminal stimuli can be used as a deterrent to countermeasures (Physical) in Lie Detection.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research