z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Doomsday Argument Reconsidered
Author(s) -
Jon Mills
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
eidos a journal for philosophy of culture
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2544-302X
DOI - 10.14394/eidos.jpc.2020.0035
Subject(s) - argument (complex analysis) , nihilism , existentialism , humanity , environmental ethics , civilization , politics , political science , political economy , history , philosophy , law , sociology , biochemistry , chemistry
In our current unstable world, nuclear warfare, climate crises, and techno nihilism are three perilous clouds hovering over an anxious humanity. In this article I examine our current state of affairs with regard to the imminent risk of nuclear holocaust, rapid climate emergencies destroying the planet, and the cultural and political consequences of emerging technologies on the fate of civilization. In the wake of innumerable existential threats to the future of our world, I revisit the plausibility of the Doomsday Argument, which predicts the end of human existence.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom