Prospects for Nordic intensive forest management solutions in the Republic of Karelia
Author(s) -
Sergei Senko,
Mikko Kurttila,
Timo Karjalainen
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
silva fennica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.622
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 2242-4075
pISSN - 0037-5330
DOI - 10.14214/sf.7763
Subject(s) - business , productivity , investment (military) , profitability index , ecoforestry , forest management , swot analysis , natural resource economics , production (economics) , resource (disambiguation) , forestry , agroforestry , forest ecology , geography , intact forest landscape , economic growth , economics , ecosystem , finance , environmental science , ecology , political science , law , macroeconomics , computer network , computer science , biology , marketing , politics
In this study, the prospects for future forest management in Republic of Karelia, Russia were analyzed. Forestry has an important role in the economy of Karelia. However, productivity and profitability in the forestry sector are extremely low, forest stand structure and quality are weak, the commercial forest land of coniferous species has declined and the wood processing industry struggles with a deficit of raw materials. The situation is typical to many forest regions in Russia with extensive forest management cited as one reason for the current situation. In contrast, the Nordic countries have significant experience in intensive and sustainable forest management and the results have been to a large extent positive. The transfer of Nordic intensive forest management solutions (NIFMS) could improve forestry in Karelia. SWOT analysis, combined with the multicriteria decision support (MCDS) method was used to identify local operational environments and to assign priorities. Major threats included unprepared regulations, poor road infrastructure, insecure investments, low forestry productivity, forest degradation, high investment costs and a negative attitude to intensive forestry. The main opportunities are high forest resource potential in Karelia, favorable authority development programs, proven Nordic expertise, wood-based energy development and availability of new technology. Results also showed that the main weaknesses that might influence the NIFMS in Karelia are slow return on investments, low market demand for energy wood, high costs associated with young forest thinnings, high demand for skilled specialists and a lack of investment in research and development.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom