English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

To assess the validity of performance measures used in a nationwide pay-for-performance (P4P) project on hip and knee replacement, we analyzed hospital performance data from a Medicare P4P initiative and compared them to publicly available outcomes data. Overall, the ability to measure hospital quality was poor. A hospital's ranking on the composite score was primarily determined by process measures. A higher composite quality score was not associated with lower rates of complications or mortality. The current Medicare P4P quality measure has limited validity because of poor discrimination, lack of measure balance, and lack of correlation with important clinical outcomes.

Measuring The Report Card: The Validity Of Pay-For-Performance Metrics In Orthopedic Surgery