z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Outstanding Questions In First Amendment Law Related To Food Labeling Disclosure Requirements For Health
Author(s) -
Jennifer L. Pomeranz
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
health affairs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.837
H-Index - 178
eISSN - 2694-233X
pISSN - 0278-2715
DOI - 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0616
Subject(s) - government (linguistics) , commercial speech , food and drug administration , business , law , food labeling , first amendment , political science , supreme court , risk analysis (engineering) , philosophy , linguistics , chemistry , food science
The federal and state governments are increasingly focusing on food labeling as a method to support good health. Many such laws are opposed by the food industry and may be challenged in court, raising the question of what is legally feasible. This article analyzes outstanding questions in First Amendment law related to commercial disclosure requirements and conducts legal analysis and policy evaluation for three current policies. These include the Food and Drug Administration's draft regulation requiring an added sugar disclosure on the Nutrition Facts panel, California's proposed sugar-sweetened beverage safety warning label bill, and Vermont's law requiring labels of genetically engineered food to disclose this information. I recommend several methods for policy makers to enact food labeling laws within First Amendment parameters, including imposing factual commercial disclosure requirements, disclosing the government entity issuing a warning, collecting evidence, and identifying legitimate governmental interests.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here