Alzheimer Disease Biomarker Testing in Cerebrospinal Fluid: A Method to Harmonize Assay Platforms in the Absence of an Absolute Reference Standard
Author(s) -
Hugo Vanderstichele,
Leslie M. Shaw,
Manu Vandijck,
Andreas Jeromin,
Henrik Zetterberg,
Kaj Blennow,
Charlotte E. Teunissen,
Sebastiaan Engelborghs
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
clinical chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.705
H-Index - 218
eISSN - 1530-8561
pISSN - 0009-9147
DOI - 10.1373/clinchem.2012.201830
Subject(s) - analyte , immunoassay , cerebrospinal fluid , standardization , biomarker , chromatography , reference range , roche diagnostics , medicine , chemistry , pathology , computer science , immunology , biochemistry , antibody , operating system
To the Editor:The acceptance of the clinical utility of protein biomarkers for Alzheimer disease diagnosis and their integration into routine clinical testing require extensive standardization at different levels (preanalytical, analytical, postanalytical) (1). The approval of such biomarkers by regulatory authorities is hampered in part by ( a ) uncertainty regarding the accuracy of values produced with different measurement technologies, ( b ) the absence of international reference standards, ( c ) the absence of validated reference methods for measuring absolute analyte concentrations, and ( d ) a lack of well-defined recommendations for immunoassay validation (2). The present letter provides a solution for harmonization of cutoff concentration values for different technology platforms by performing immunoassays that use calibrators consisting of undiluted cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).1For this exploratory study, 197 CSF samples had been analyzed previously at the same time (on 5 different immunoplates) by ELISA [INNOTEST® β-Amyloid(1–42); Innogenetics, single analyte, CE version] and Luminex's xMAP assay system with the INNO-BIA AlzBio3 assay (Innogenetics; multiplexed, research use only assay) (3). Differences in the design of the assays have previously been described (4). The plate layouts for CSF testing for the 2 assay formats were identical. No new test runs were performed for the current study. Kit calibrators consisted of synthetic β-amyloid(1–42) dissolved in a phosphate-buffered solution. After run validation (criteria: out of range, precision, bead count), 31 CSF …
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom