Art and Science: Interacting Universes
Author(s) -
Marek H Dominiczak
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
clinical chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.705
H-Index - 218
eISSN - 1530-8561
pISSN - 0009-9147
DOI - 10.1373/clinchem.2012.199901
Subject(s) - interpretation (philosophy) , distrust , mindset , science communication , the arts , epistemology , popular science , perception , convergence (economics) , sociology , psychology , science education , political science , computer science , philosophy , law , pedagogy , economics , programming language , economic growth
Science needs public support, and therefore communicating science well to the wider society is paramount. On the other hand, the very essence of art is that it communicates ideas and invites interpretation. That is a fascinating convergence.In science, communication is done by scientists themselves, by popular-science writers, or by journalists. There have been exceptional communicators, such as the American physicist Richard Feynman (1918–1988). On the other hand, a degree of distrust has existed, at least within some scientific communities, of “outsiders” who dare to speak about—or criticize—science. The issue might be that although artworks may comment on science, their perception or interpretation is not predictable. But then that is the essence of an open discourse, and neither scientific training nor a scientific mindset is geared to make the high cultural impact that the arts can achieve.In recent decades, the effective dissemination of messages related to the risks associated with a high-cholesterol diet, for instance, has been …
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom