Evaluation of the Performance of Randomized versus Fixed Time Schedules for Quality Control Procedures | Zendy

Curtis A. Parvin | Zendy; Sanford Robbins | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Evaluation of the Performance of Randomized versus Fixed Time Schedules for Quality Control Procedures

Author(s) -

Curtis A. Parvin,

Sanford Robbins

Publication year - 2007

Publication title -

clinical chemistry

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.705

H-Index - 218

eISSN - 1530-8561

pISSN - 0009-9147

DOI - 10.1373/clinchem.2006.083311

Subject(s) - scheduling (production processes) , statistics , computer science , interval (graph theory) , mathematics , mathematical optimization , combinatorics

Although minimum regulatory standards exist for determining QC testing frequency, decisions regarding when and how to run QC samples are not standardized. Most QC testing strategies test control samples at fixed time intervals, often placing the samples in the same position on an instrument during subsequent QC events and leaving large gaps of time when control samples are never run, yet patient samples are being tested.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research