z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Sampling Time Is Important but May Be Overlooked in Establishment and Use of Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Reference Intervals
Author(s) -
Esther Jensen,
Ole Blaabjerg,
Per Hyltoft Petersen,
László Hegedűs
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
clinical chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.705
H-Index - 218
eISSN - 1530-8561
pISSN - 0009-9147
DOI - 10.1373/clinchem.2006.078964
Subject(s) - limit (mathematics) , confidence interval , thyroid , hormone , thyroid stimulating hormone , interval (graph theory) , sampling (signal processing) , medicine , reference values , endocrinology , statistics , mathematics , computer science , filter (signal processing) , computer vision , mathematical analysis , combinatorics
In the current debate on reference interval(s) for serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations, a lowering of the upper reference limit from ∼4.0 to 2.5, or even 2.0, mU/L has been proposed by the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NABC) (1). This proposal is based in part on the observation that populations with the lowest prevalence of antithyroid antibodies have the lowest TSH upper limits. Other arguments for the lowering of the upper limit of the reference interval are related to the question of whether mild TSH increases have any clinical consequences. This question, however, illustrates the problem of mixing the concepts of ( a ) decision limits (e.g., discrimination values, cutoffs, action limits), which are based on the clinical consequences and treatment strategies and ( b ) reference intervals, which are based solely on biology and mathematics applied in an appropriate …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom