Conflict between Guideline Methodologic Quality and Recommendation Validity: A Potential Problem for Practitioners
Author(s) -
Joseph Watine,
Bruno Friedberg,
É. Nagy,
Rita Ónody,
Wytze P. Oosterhuis,
Peter S. Bunting,
Jean-Christophe Charet,
Andrea R. Horvath
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
clinical chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.705
H-Index - 218
eISSN - 1530-8561
pISSN - 0009-9147
DOI - 10.1373/clinchem.2005.056952
Subject(s) - guideline , medicine , medline , quality (philosophy) , systematic review , evidence based medicine , medical education , family medicine , psychology , alternative medicine , pathology , political science , philosophy , epistemology , law
It is not clear if good methodologic quality in current practice guidelines necessarily leads to more valid recommendations, i.e., those that are supported with consistent research evidence or, when evidence is conflicting or lacking, with sufficient consensus among the guideline development team. To help clarify this issue, we assessed whether there is a link between methodologic quality and recommendation validity in practice guidelines for the use of laboratory tests in the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom