z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Conflict between Guideline Methodologic Quality and Recommendation Validity: A Potential Problem for Practitioners
Author(s) -
Joseph Watine,
Bruno Friedberg,
É. Nagy,
Rita Ónody,
Wytze P. Oosterhuis,
Peter S. Bunting,
Jean-Christophe Charet,
Andrea R. Horvath
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
clinical chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.705
H-Index - 218
eISSN - 1530-8561
pISSN - 0009-9147
DOI - 10.1373/clinchem.2005.056952
Subject(s) - guideline , medicine , medline , quality (philosophy) , systematic review , evidence based medicine , medical education , family medicine , psychology , alternative medicine , pathology , political science , philosophy , epistemology , law
It is not clear if good methodologic quality in current practice guidelines necessarily leads to more valid recommendations, i.e., those that are supported with consistent research evidence or, when evidence is conflicting or lacking, with sufficient consensus among the guideline development team. To help clarify this issue, we assessed whether there is a link between methodologic quality and recommendation validity in practice guidelines for the use of laboratory tests in the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom