Detection and Monitoring of SARS Coronavirus in the Plasma and Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Author(s) -
Haibin Wang,
Yuanli Mao,
Liancai Ju,
Jing Zhang,
Zhiguo Liu,
Xianzhi Zhou,
Qinghong Li,
Yuedong Wang,
Sunghee Kim,
Lurong Zhang
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
clinical chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.705
H-Index - 218
eISSN - 1530-8561
pISSN - 0009-9147
DOI - 10.1373/clinchem.2004.031237
Subject(s) - covid-19 , medicine , peripheral blood , sars virus , respiratory system , coronavirus , severe acute respiratory syndrome , virology , immunology , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty) , outbreak
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a newly emerged infectious disease, and a novel SARS-associated coronavirus (CoV) has been identified as a causative agent (1)(2)(3). Reliable and sensitive determination of the SARS CoV load would aid in the early identification of infected individuals, provide guidance for treatment (especially the use of steroid hormones and antiviral agents), and aid in monitoring of a patient’s clinical course and outcome.Among the available tests, viral gene amplification by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) provides a relatively rapid and specific test for the diagnosis of individuals showing SARS-associated symptoms (4)(5). RT-PCR was successfully used to detect SARS CoV in nasopharyngeal aspirates, nasopharyngeal swabs, throat swabs, and broncheoalveolar lavage of SARS patients (6)(7). However, because the composition of these samples varies with time and among individuals, they are unlikely to serve as a standardized sample source for quantification, comparison, or monitoring of SARS CoV infection. To meet clinical needs, some improved RT-PCR methods have been developed, and plasma has been used as a sample source (8)(9)(10). The consistency of plasma composition makes it a good sample source for monitoring the CoV load.CoV-enriched samples are critical for achieving a high detection rate. Current methods have a limited detection window, largely because they do not fully utilize the CoV viral RNA in the sample. Because of its high false-negative rate, the current method is unable to definitively rule out SARS within days after onset (11). An increase in viral RNA input could enhance the chance of detecting CoV (12).The input to PCR can be increased by reducing the loss of CoV during sample preparation (8)(12) or by increasing the amount of prepared CoV RNA and cDNA product used in the final PCR …
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom