Influence of playing position and laterality in centripetal force and changes of direction in elite soccer players
Author(s) -
Paulino Granero-Gil,
Carlos D. GómezCarmona,
Alejandro BastidaCastillo,
Daniel RojasValverde,
Ernesto De La Cruz,
José PinoOrtega
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0232123
Subject(s) - laterality , centripetal force , analysis of variance , anthropometry , zoology , mathematics , clockwise , anatomy , medicine , physics , geometry , statistics , biology , rotation (mathematics) , audiology , mechanics
The purpose of the present study was to: (a) assess centripetal force (CentF) and changes of direction (COD) in elite soccer players according to playing position (central defender, CD; lateral defender, LD; central midfielder, CM; lateral midfielder, LM; forward, FW), laterality (right-footed vs. left-footed) and field zone (central vs. lateral), and (b) analyze the relationship between anthropometric characteristics (age, weight, height, body mass and fat mass) and non-linear locomotion workload. Thirty professional soccer players (age: 26.57±5.56 years) were tracked during the 2017–2018 season during friendly, national and international matches (38 total games) using inertial measurement devices. CentF and COD were the variables extracted for analysis. A one-way ANOVA was used for playing position comparison, a t-test for laterality and field zone, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient to analyze relationships between anthropometric characteristics and dependent variables. There were differences by playing position in COD (556.33-to-412.18), R 20 COD (484.36-to-354.81) and R 60 COD (48.38-to-38.61) ( p < .01; ω p 2 = 0.03-to-0.05; CD>CM>LD>LM = FW); in COD HIA (49.75-to-37.11), R 20 COD HIA (16.04-to-9.11) and R 60 COD HIA (10.64-to-9.11) ( p < .01; ω p 2 = 0.03-to-0.07; CM>FW>LM>CD = LD); in COD SPRINT (14.56-to-8.40) and R 20 COD SPRINT (3.29-to-1.40) ( p < .01; ω p 2 = 0.03-to-0.04; FW = LM = CM>CD = LD); and in CentF MAX both in clockwise (992.04-to-902.09N) and counterclockwise (999.24-to-872.61N) directions ( p < .02; ω p 2 = 0.02-to-0.07; FW = CD>CM = LM = LD). The highest values of counterclockwise CentF were performed by left-footed players in the central zone ( p < .001; d = 0.71-to-1.44) and clockwise CentF by right-footed players ( p < .001; d = 0.04-to-0.55) in the lateral field zone. Moderate correlations were found between age, body mass and high intensity/sprints COD and repeated COD ability ( p < .05; r = 0.235-to-0.383). Therefore, team staff should consider anthropometric characteristics, playing position, laterality and field zone to individualize training workload related to non-linear locomotion in soccer.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom