z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Cluster randomised trial on the effectiveness of a computerised prompt to refer (back) patients with type 2 diabetes
Author(s) -
Maaike C. M. Ronda,
Lioe-Ting Dijkhorst-Oei,
Rimke C. Vos,
Paul Westers,
Guy E.H.M. Rutten
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0207653
Subject(s) - medicine , cluster randomised controlled trial , intervention (counseling) , family medicine , randomized controlled trial , cluster (spacecraft) , primary care , diabetes mellitus , medline , secondary care , physical therapy , nursing , endocrinology , computer science , political science , law , programming language
Aims Information and communications technology (ICT) could support care organisations to cope with the increasing number of patients with diabetes mellitus. We aimed to aid diabetes care providers in allocating patients to the preferred treatment setting (hospital outpatient clinic or primary care practice), by using the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). Methods A cluster randomised controlled trial. Physicians in primary and secondary care practices of the intervention group received an advisory message in the EMR during diabetes consultations if patients were treated in the ‘incorrect’ setting according to national management guidelines. Primary outcome: the proportion of patients that shifted to the correct treatment setting at one year follow-up. Results 47 (38 primary care and 9 internist) practices and 2778 patients were included. At baseline, 1197 (43.1%) patients were in the correct treatment setting (intervention 599; control 598). Advice most often (68.4%) regarded a consultation with the internist. After one year 12.4% of the patients in the intervention and 10.6% in the control group (p = 0.30) had shifted to the correct setting. Main reasons for not following advice were: 1. physician’s preference to consider other treatment options; 2. patients’ preferences. Conclusions We could not find evidence that using the EMR to send consultation-linked advice to physicians resulted in a shift in patients. Physicians will not follow the advice, at least partly due to patients’ preferences.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom