Tuberculosis transmission in the Indigenous peoples of the Canadian prairies
Author(s) -
Smit J Patel,
Catherine Paulsen,
Courtney Heffernan,
Duncan Saunders,
Meenu K. Sharma,
Malcolm King,
Ver Hoeppner,
Pamela Orr,
Dennis Kunimoto,
Dick Menzies,
Sara Christianson,
Joyce Wolfe,
Jody Boffa,
Kathleen McMullin,
Carmen Lopez-Hille,
Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan,
Richard Long
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0188189
Subject(s) - indigenous , transmission (telecommunications) , demography , tuberculosis , odds ratio , medicine , contact tracing , confidence interval , incidence (geometry) , geography , veterinary medicine , environmental health , disease , biology , ecology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , pathology , covid-19 , sociology , electrical engineering , engineering , physics , optics
Setting The prairie provinces of Canada. Objective To characterize tuberculosis (TB) transmission among the Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadian-born peoples of the prairie provinces of Canada. Design A prospective epidemiologic study of consecutively diagnosed adult (age ≥ 14 years) Canadian-born culture-positive pulmonary TB cases on the prairies, hereafter termed “potential transmitters,” and the transmission events generated by them. “Transmission events” included new positive tuberculin skin tests (TSTs), TST conversions, and secondary cases among contacts. Results In the years 2007 and 2008, 222 potential transmitters were diagnosed on the prairies. Of these, the vast majority (198; 89.2%) were Indigenous peoples who resided in either an Indigenous community (135; 68.2%) or a major metropolitan area (44; 22.2%). Over the 4.5-year period between July 1 st , 2006 and December 31 st 2010, 1085 transmission events occurred in connection with these potential transmitters. Most of these transmission events were attributable to potential transmitters who identified as Indigenous (94.5%). With a few notable exceptions most transmitters and their infected contacts resided in the same community type. In multivariate models positive smear status and a higher number of close contacts were associated with increased transmission; adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), 4.30 [1.88, 9.84] and 2.88 [1.31, 6.34], respectively. Among infected contacts, being Indigenous was associated with disease progression; OR and 95% CI, 3.59 [1.27, 10.14] and 6.89 [2.04, 23.25] depending upon Indigenous group, while being an infected casual contact was less likely than being a close contact to be associated with disease progression, 0.66 [0.44, 1.00]. Conclusion In the prairie provinces of Canada and among Canadian-born persons, Indigenous peoples account for the vast majority of cases with the potential to transmit as well as the vast majority of infected contacts. Active case finding and preventative therapy measures need to focus on high-incidence Indigenous communities.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom